News

Mining Company Cuts 1140V MCCB Failures by 60% with Soutya Breakers

2026-08-11 0 Leave me a message

Customer Background

A copper-gold mining operation in Western Australia runs underground conveyor systems, dewatering pumps, and ventilation fans on a 1140V AC network. The site produces 3.2 million tons of ore per year and employs a 12-person electrical maintenance team. The plant operates continuously, with only two scheduled shutdown windows per year.

The Challenge: Frequent Breaker Failures at 1140V

The original breakers on the 1140V circuits were not rated for that voltage. They were 690V molded case circuit breakers modified with extra insulation, but they still tripped thermally, arced, and failed under load. Unplanned outages occurred eight times per month on average. Each outage cost $16,000 in lost production and repair labor, plus the risk of arc flash injuries. Replacement parts had to be sourced from overseas, with lead times of six to eight weeks. The maintenance team spent 30% of its time chasing breaker faults instead of doing preventive work.

Why the Soutya 1140V AC Molded Case Circuit Breaker?

The site evaluated vacuum contactors, retrofit kits, and standard low-voltage breakers with external relays. Vacuum contactors solved the voltage issue but required new panels and control wiring, driving the project cost above $180,000. Retrofit kits had uncertain reliability. The Soutya 1140V AC molded case circuit breaker offered a true 1140V rating with a breaking capacity of 25kA, adjustable thermal-magnetic trip units, and a compact frame that fit the existing switchgear. The price per unit was $310, which was 35% less than a comparable contactor installation. The site also valued the unit's ability to handle high inrush currents from large motors without nuisance tripping.

Implementation Process

The replacement project took 12 weeks from the first site audit to final commissioning. The team installed 34 Soutya MCCBs across the conveyor, pump, and fan circuits. Key steps included:

  • Load bank testing each breaker at 1140V and 120% of rated current to verify trip curves.
  • Adjusting magnetic trip settings based on actual motor inrush measurements.
  • Embedding the new breaker frames in the existing panels with minimal modification.
  • Conducting thermal imaging surveys before and after energization to spot hot spots.
  • Training four local electricians on trip-setting procedures and troubleshooting.

One challenge was coordinating the new breakers with existing protection relays. The fix was to enable the MCCB's short-time delay function, which allowed the downstream relays to clear faults first without tripping the main breaker.

Quantifiable Results

After three months of operation, the results were clear:

  • Unplanned outages dropped from 8 per month to 2 per month – a 75% reduction.
  • Total electrical downtime fell by 45% across the site, adding roughly 90 hours of additional production time per quarter.
  • Annual breaker replacement costs dropped from $26,000 to $4,500, a savings of $21,500.
  • Mean time between failures increased from 32 days to 240 days.
  • Maintenance labor reallocated to preventive work rose by 25 hours per month.

The breaker failure rate per year went from six incidents to one. The site also recorded no arc flash incidents during the review

Client Testimonial

The electrical superintendent at the mine said: "We were replacing breakers every few weeks before. Now they run for months without a hiccup. The adjustable trip units let us match protection to each motor, and the breakers handle the 1140V without any heat issues."

Lessons and Recommendations

Other plants running 1140V systems can replicate this approach:

  • Verify the true voltage rating. Look for breakers designed and tested for 1140V AC, not modified lower-voltage units.
  • Perform load bank testing before full installation. This catches trip-curve mismatches and manufacturing defects early.
  • Set trip curves from real inrush data, not nameplate values. Motors starting loaded draw up to 8x their full-load current for a few seconds, and a standard inverse-time breaker may trip unnecessarily.

The team also noted that if they re-did the project, they would document the trip settings of every original breaker before replacement to speed up the commissioning process.

References

UL 489 Ed. 14-2025 - Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Molded-Case Switches and Circuit-Breaker Enclosures. ANSI/UL 489-2025. Webstore.ansi.org.

UL 489 - Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Molded-Case Switches and Circuit-Breaker Enclosures. UL Standards. 2021. ShopULStandards.com.

1140V AC Molded Case Circuit Breaker

Related News
Leave me a message
X
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, analyze site traffic and personalize content. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.Privacy Policy
RejectAccept